[PATCH v2] __builtin_expect cleanup for iconv{,data}/*.c
Florian Weimer
fweimer@redhat.com
Wed Sep 10 07:46:00 GMT 2014
On 09/10/2014 01:55 AM, Kalle Olavi Niemitalo wrote:
> Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com> writes:
>
>> --- a/iconv/gconv_simple.c
>> +++ b/iconv/gconv_simple.c
>> @@ -387,8 +387,7 @@ ucs4_internal_loop_single (struct __gconv_step *step,
>> return __GCONV_INCOMPLETE_INPUT;
>> }
>>
>> - if (__builtin_expect (((unsigned char *) state->__value.__wchb)[0] > 0x80,
>> - 0))
>> + if (__glibc_unlikely (((unsigned char *) state->__value.__wchb)[0] > 0x80))
>
> I think that is a bug in the original code. Should compare > 0x7f.
> Likewise in internal_ucs4_loop_unaligned.
> Contrast to ucs4_internal_loop, which compares inval > 0x7fffffff.
This might be the case. But it seems this code is effectively
dead—iconv only converts complete multi-byte sequences, and the mbr*
need a matching locale, and we haven't got a UCS-4 locale (multi-byte
character sets which regularly use NUL bytes do not work with C).
Please file a bug if you think this still needs fixing, especially if
you can write a test case which shows the issue.
>> - if (__builtin_expect (flags & GCONV_AVOID_NOCONV, 0)
>> + if (__glibc_unlikely (flags & GCONV_AVOID_NOCONV)
>
> This looks a bit suspicious because it is not obvious that the
> flags & GCONV_AVOID_NOCONV expression always evaluates to 0 or 1.
> I'm not sure __glibc_unlikely ((flags & GCONV_AVOID_NOCONV) != 0)
> would be any nicer, though.
Has glibc a rule not to rely on implicit booleans? Than the != 0
variant would be preferred.
>> - /*if (__builtin_expect (ch, 0) == __UNKNOWN_10646_CHAR)*/ \
>> + /*if (__glibc_unlikely (ch == __UNKNOWN_10646_CHAR))*/ \
>> if (__glibc_unlikely (ch == __UNKNOWN_10646_CHAR)) \
>
> I don't think that comment has any value left.
Okay, I'll remove it.
> I didn't finish reading the patch yet.
Thanks so far!
--
Florian Weimer / Red Hat Product Security
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list