test failures with gcc 4.4
Chris Metcalf
cmetcalf@tilera.com
Sat Sep 6 17:39:00 GMT 2014
I went ahead and created a new "Compiler-dependent" section on the 2.20 release wiki page for build and test failures, and a "gcc 4.4" section under that, and mentioned the ISO11 conform tests, the __SIG_ATOMIC_TYPE__ issue, and the build failures on the elf/tst-unique[34] tests.
On 9/5/2014 4:36 PM, Chris Metcalf wrote:
> I notice that there are some issues with older gcc for the tests. We've already had a discussion about the failures building elf/tst-unique{3lib,4lib,3lib2}.so here:
>
> https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2012-06/msg00430.html
>
> but I don't see those failures mentioned yet anywhere in the test results page.
>
> Similarly, my conform results show a bunch of failures from using gcc 4.4, which I summarize under the TILE-Gx section (for now) as:
>
> - The ISO11 conform tests fail because gcc 4.4 does not support "-std=c1x"
> - The inttypes.h and stdint.h conform tests fail because gcc 4.4 does not define __SIG_ATOMIC_TYPE__
>
> Would it make sense to create a new section on the 2.20 release wiki page for compiler-specific failures and put all of these in that section? Unfortunately the elf/tst-unique{3lib,4lib,3lib2}.so are build failures and so cause "make -k check" to fail to complete and as a result I just end up commenting them out in elf/Makefile, which isn't particularly clean.
>
--
Chris Metcalf, Tilera Corp.
http://www.tilera.com
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list