C11 threads ABI questions - enum values

Rich Felker dalias@libc.org
Thu Oct 23 16:38:00 GMT 2014


On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 12:37:23PM -0400, Rich Felker wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 10:00:34AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 05, 2014 at 06:23:17PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > On Sun, Oct 05, 2014 at 12:13:58PM -0400, Rich Felker wrote:
> > > > Yes, the lack of support for fchown, fchmod, fstat, fstatfs, fchdir,
> > > 
> > > fstat, fstatfs and fchdir are already support on O_PATH descriptos, and
> > > below is an untested patch for fchmod and fchown.
> > 
> > Can you verify that this is enough to get full O_SEARCH semantics from
> > the kernel?  I can submit this one ASAP, and then we can try to help to
> > make the new execveat suitable for O_EXEC.
> 
> I've got a lot of things I'm working on at the moment, but I'll try to
> give it a test maybe early next week. Is that soon enough?

Hmm, looking again it looks like it's not so much a matter of testing
the patch as verifying that there are no other missing cases. Is that
right? Let me know if I'm misunderstanding what you want.

Rich



More information about the Libc-alpha mailing list