Subsystem maintainers

Thomas Schwinge thomas@codesourcery.com
Fri Oct 17 08:20:00 GMT 2014


Hi!

On Wed, 8 Oct 2014 23:29:02 +0000, "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Oct 2014, Torvald Riegel wrote:
> 
> > > I agree.  So, basically, extend (and rename)
> > > <https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/MAINTAINERS#Reviewers_by_component>.
> > 
> > Or add the additional column for "component owners".

Yes, for example.

> > We might also want to not just base this on components, but other
> > cross-cutting things like "security".  For example, I'd be happy to
> > review everything related to concurrency.

Agreed.

> I've added more reviewers to that table based on this discussion.  We may 
> wish to allow for more discussion of subsystem maintainers as people who 
> can assume consensus for their changes in a given area by default (the 
> general concept, or specific people for specific components) before 
> listing any of those.

I'd like to propse Florian Weimer for the security "component" (that is,
issues related to system security).


Grüße,
 Thomas
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 472 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/attachments/20141017/da557ff8/attachment.sig>


More information about the Libc-alpha mailing list