Clean up patchwork.sourceware.org

[Siddhesh Poyarekar]

On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 05:08:53PM +0000, Joseph Myers wrote:
> Cleaning up entries for other people's patches is a good idea as well - 
> especially as occasional contributors are less likely to ping regularly 
> and part of the point of patchwork is to stop patches getting lost.  (Of 
> course reviewing old patches you find and feel competent to review helps 
> as well.)

I agree for contributors who are not maintainers, but for those who
are, they should be cleaning up after themselves.

> If there are several versions of the same patch there, and it's not yet 
> in, all except the last should be marked Superseded.  I think "Not 
> Applicable" is right for a patch to something else (e.g. Linux kernel) on 
> which libc-alpha was CC:ed.

Right, that's what the workflow says.

Siddhesh
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/attachments/20141129/8767f6b6/attachment.sig>