[PATCH 0/4] Provide C11 atomic operations

[Joseph Myers]

On Thu, 20 Nov 2014, Torvald Riegel wrote:

> I have committed this patch after some more code comparison for x86_64
> pthread_once using a current GCC, and a regression check on x86_64.  The
> fast path has identical code.  On the slow path, there are some minor
> differences in which instructions are used, but I didn't spot anything
> hat looked significant.
> I've also fixed the Changelog; Adhemerval, thanks for spotting this.

What is the basis for __HAVE_64B_ATOMICS in 
sysdeps/microblaze/bits/atomic.h?  It looks to me as if the existing 
64-bit operations there all abort.

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com