patchwork.sourceware.org is live!

[Siddhesh Poyarekar]

On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 09:56:55PM -0400, Samuel Bronson wrote:
> Are there any objections to the new state?

None so far.  I have added it to patchwork now.  I have not yet made
'Accepted' an 'Action Required' state because that will clutter the
view; I'll do it when I get explicit blessings from more maintainers.

> > That should be set automatically. I use a following script to detect
> > commited patches.
> 
> If there are no objections, I guess the script will need to be changed
> to put patches in the "Committed" state instead of the "Accepted" state?
> 
> However, really I'd prefer if it could give some indication as to
> *which* commit(s) the patch was committed as, and it doesn't look like
> this is viable with the current approach, since you seem to just test if
> each patch can be applied backwards to HEAD.
> 
> Oh, but now I notice that that *particular* script is glibc-only anyway,
> so maybe I don't really care that much ...

That particular script was just an example, so ideas for automating
this are still welcome.

Siddhesh
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/attachments/20140530/01902cac/attachment.sig>