[PATCH 0/2] inprove vfork compat

[Richard Henderson]

Two changes that were discussed on list, and one that wasn't.

Was there a particular reason you eschewed gcc's ifunc support?
Is it too new or something?  It certainly seems better than having
to mark the function "used", and knowing how the target handles "set".

Ok?


r~


Richard Henderson (2):
  Only support ifunc in nptl/pt-vfork.c
  Only provide non-default symbols in libpthread for vfork

 nptl/pt-vfork.c | 47 ++++++++++++++++-------------------------------
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)

-- 
1.9.0