Actually setting up patchwork on sourceware

[Siddhesh Poyarekar]

On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 10:01:48AM +0100, Pedro Alves wrote:
> On 05/13/14 07:04, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote:
> > On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 01:17:26PM -0400, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
> >> Hi -
> >>
> >>> [...]  Frank, did you get a chance to look at it?  I have
> >>> documented[1] the process I had followed to do the patchwork setup
> >>> on my host.  [...]
> >>
> >> Sorry, I was under the impression that y'all were still choosing
> >> between patchwork and other alternatives.  (Maybe "y'all" included gdb
> >> folks, cc:'d.)  We'd love not to have to have N new but similar
> >> widgets running on sourceware.
> > 
> > I had set up a test instance for gdb folks too and Gary had requested
> > that I also migrate the gdb instance from my server to sourceware
> > since it would take a while for gdb to decide on their final choice,
> > so I'm not sure if it's worth our while to wait for that to happen.
> 
> Yes, please migrate gdb's too.  At least myself, I'm finding the
> gdb instance useful.  As long as it exists, might as well have it set
> up alongside glibc's.

That's great.  Given that 10 days have past since your response, is it
safe to assume that nobody in the gdb community is opposed to using
patchwork?

Siddhesh
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/attachments/20140523/14d1e6c1/attachment.sig>