[PATCH][BZ #16876] Fix typo in nptl/sockperf.c
Will Newton
will.newton@linaro.org
Tue May 6 08:03:00 GMT 2014
On 27 April 2014 17:02, Ondřej Bílka <neleai@seznam.cz> wrote:
> Hi, as described in
>
> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16876
>
> relevant if test does not make sense as it tests if pointer is negative.
> A clisock variable is unused outside of this test so we should fix it to
> intended behaviour.
>
> OK to commit?
>
>
> [BZ #16876]
> * nptl/sockperf.c (client): Check if socket exist.
"Check socket return value" would be clearer I think, but otherwise
looks ok to me.
> diff --git a/nptl/sockperf.c b/nptl/sockperf.c
> index 740fb88..2d4b872 100644
> --- a/nptl/sockperf.c
> +++ b/nptl/sockperf.c
> @@ -71,7 +71,6 @@ client (void *arg)
> struct thread_param *param = arg;
> unsigned int cnt;
> unsigned int nserv = param->nserv;
> - int clisock[nserv];
> struct pollfd servpoll[nserv];
> struct sockaddr_un servaddr;
> socklen_t servlen;
> @@ -102,7 +101,7 @@ client (void *arg)
> for (cnt = 0; cnt < nserv; ++cnt)
> {
> servpoll[cnt].fd = socket (AF_UNIX, SOCK_STREAM, 0);
> - if (clisock < 0)
> + if (servpoll[cnt].fd < 0)
> {
> puts ("cannot create socket in client");
> return NULL;
--
Will Newton
Toolchain Working Group, Linaro
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list