[PATCH] PowerPC: Define __PTHREAD_MUTEX_HAVE_ELISION to 0
Roland McGrath
roland@hack.frob.com
Tue Mar 25 17:09:00 GMT 2014
> On 25-03-2014 13:55, Roland McGrath wrote:
> >> I would prefer this approach instead of create/install another header.
> > Why? It leaves a place for typo bugs to sneak in on new architectures.
> >
> I see a plus header another burden for arch ports to be aware of. GLIBC
> is already quite complex of required arch depends files and subly
> non-arch files that arch maintainer also need to be aware one. I
> personally not found of add another one.
I fail to see how a subtle and typo-prone requirement on some other
existing arch-specific header is better than a typo-proof clear requirement
on a new arch-specific header.
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list