[PowerPC64] Correct IBM long double nextafterl
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com
Tue Mar 25 12:13:00 GMT 2014
On Tue, 25 Mar 2014, Alan Modra wrote:
> + TEST_ff_f (nextafter, 1.0L, -10.0L, 1.0L-0x1p-106L, NO_EXCEPTION),
> + TEST_ff_f (nextafter, 1.0L, 10.0L, 1.0L+0x1p-105L, NO_EXCEPTION),
> + TEST_ff_f (nextafter, 1.0L-0x1p-106L, 10.0L, 1.0L, NO_EXCEPTION),
> + TEST_ff_f (nextafter, -1.0L, -10.0L, -1.0L-0x1p-105L, NO_EXCEPTION),
> + TEST_ff_f (nextafter, -1.0L, 10.0L, -1.0L+0x1p-106L, NO_EXCEPTION),
> + TEST_ff_f (nextafter, -1.0L+0x1p-106L, -10.0L, -1.0L, NO_EXCEPTION),
You mean NO_INEXACT_EXCEPTION (NO_EXCEPTION makes no assertion about
whether or not "inexact" is present; "inexact" has a different default
from the other exceptions, following ISO C Annex F).
--
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list