[PATCH] Remove PRI_MACROS_BROKEN define usage

Joseph S. Myers joseph@codesourcery.com
Fri Mar 21 00:44:00 GMT 2014


On Thu, 20 Mar 2014, Adhemerval Zanella wrote:

> > Any change brought from gettext would best be committed on its own 
> > (ideally with the original author of that change in gettext being 
> > credited).
> >
> The changes I have incorporated on the patch is just change the old K&R
> function prototype to ISO C, remove and superfluous ';' and change a 
> free call to remove an unnecessary cast. For these straightforward patches
> do we really need to track the ones how made then and commit a set of
> patches? 

You could probably just say "Change merged from gettext." or similar 
without detailed attribution - but a change coming from gettext should 
still be committed separately from a change not coming from gettext.

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com



More information about the Libc-alpha mailing list