[PATCH] Remove PRI_MACROS_BROKEN define usage
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com
Fri Mar 21 00:44:00 GMT 2014
On Thu, 20 Mar 2014, Adhemerval Zanella wrote:
> > Any change brought from gettext would best be committed on its own
> > (ideally with the original author of that change in gettext being
> > credited).
> >
> The changes I have incorporated on the patch is just change the old K&R
> function prototype to ISO C, remove and superfluous ';' and change a
> free call to remove an unnecessary cast. For these straightforward patches
> do we really need to track the ones how made then and commit a set of
> patches?
You could probably just say "Change merged from gettext." or similar
without detailed attribution - but a change coming from gettext should
still be committed separately from a change not coming from gettext.
--
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list