[PATCH] Use SHLIB_COMPAT for libc symbols only if building libc.so

[Siddhesh Poyarekar]

On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 03:48:14PM -0700, Roland McGrath wrote:
> This seems worse to me.  I've been vaguely noodling about some centralized
> macro regime to make the NOT_IN_*/IS_IN_* cases #if-friendly.  Let's figure
> out what we want to do about those in general before considering
> SHLIB_COMPAT.  I tend to think that it's a more maintainable interface to
> have '#if SHLIB_COMPAT (libfoo, ...)' be a standalone test that encompasses
> the IS_IN_libfoo test (just as it encompasses the SHARED test).

Agreed, I wasn't expecting this patch to go through at all and just
wanted a general idea of how we expect these bits to look.  I briefly
thought about NOT_IN_*/IS_IN_* too, but decided that it would take up
much more time than I'm willing to invest into it right now.

Siddhesh
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/attachments/20140319/88124dbb/attachment.sig>