Setting up patchwork on sourceware
Siddhesh Poyarekar
siddhesh@redhat.com
Tue Mar 18 14:53:00 GMT 2014
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 10:24:51AM -0400, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> On 03/18/2014 06:22 AM, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 10:40:39AM +0100, Ondřej Bílka wrote:
> >> I am there, when will you move patchwork to sourceware?
> >
> > I've added you to the glibc project maintainers, so you should be able
> > to change state for patches you review.
> >
> > I was looking for feedback from maintainers (and a go-ahead of sorts)
> > on the set up before setting up the sourceware instance. Carlos made
> > it clear that we want to keep the service on sourceware, so I don't
> > mind doing it right away if everyone is OK.
>
> We will move it to sourceware if developers can find a useful workflow
> and several of us agree that it's a good thing to have.
>
> So far I'm happy with the workflow and I have been tagging patches
> as reviewed when I review them. I'm also doing work others would normally
> do by cleaning the patch queue for committed patches.
... which reminds me that I had volunteered to do a write-up of a
workflow for us. I'll post a draft this week.
Siddhesh
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/attachments/20140318/447e7f22/attachment.sig>
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list