[PATCH roland/nptl] Clean up NPTL fork to be compat-only.

[Joseph S. Myers]

On Mon, 23 Jun 2014, Roland McGrath wrote:

> +/* libpthread once had its own fork, though there was no apparent reason
> +   for it.  There is no use in having a separate symbol in libpthread, but
> +   the historical ABI requires it.  For static linking, there is no need to
> +   provide anything here--the libc version will be linked in.  For shared
> +   library ABI compatibility, there must be __vfork and vfork symbols in

__fork and fork not __vfork and vfork?

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com