Please address NI_NUMERICSCOPE issue

[Joseph S. Myers]

On Tue, 3 Jun 2014, Rich Felker wrote:

> On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 06:06:43PM -0400, Rich Felker wrote:
> > See bug #14102: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14102
> > 
> > Even if nobody is willing to add the functionality immediately, can we
> > at least agree on a value it will have when it's added?
> 
> This issue is really trivial and I've been waiting for someone to
> address it for almost 2 years now. Is the attached patch acceptable?

You need to explain why you think ignoring the flag is a valid 
implementation (or that defining it without implementing it is more 
helpful to applications, or better accords with established glibc 
conventions, than not defining it until there is an implementation).

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com