glibc 2.19 status?

[Robert Schiele]

On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 8:12 AM, Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh@redhat.com> wrote:
> I don't mind counting internal distributions.  My point is that it is
> probably not practical to expect release branches to be actively
> maintained by the existing set of maintainers if none of them actually
> use these branches actively in their distributions.  If there are
> internal distributions that care about these branches then I'd like to
> see them come forward and volunteer time to work with the community
> and maybe even do the backports.

If I find something that I need and is not specific to our
distribution or exotic hardware I will definitely send that upstream.
So far that was not yet the case for glibc since the content there was
fine or in case there was a problem someone else did the fixing
already before I noticed.

Robert