glibc 2.19 status?

[Siddhesh Poyarekar]

On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 09:36:07PM +0000, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> I'd think backporting to 2.19 branch any documentation that doesn't make 
> the cut-off for the release should be fine.  (Though we haven't yet 
> managed to do particularly well with handling release branches after 
> release.  They should have most or all of the bug-fix patches distributors 

Does anybody actually use the release branches, i.e. to cut tarballs
for their distributions and manage patches?  I know we don't in Fedora
and RHEL.

Siddhesh