glibc 2.19 - asyn-signal safe TLS and ASan.
Carlos O'Donell
carlos@redhat.com
Thu Jan 30 05:54:00 GMT 2014
On 01/30/2014 12:52 AM, Kostya Serebryany wrote:
>> Not terrible at all, quite elegant actually.
>
> As a hack -- yes, maybe.
Sorry, you made it sound really bad, but the solution was elegant.
> As a real solution for 2.20+ -- I hope we can do better.
> Besides, adding an interceptor to __tls_get_addr means that dynamic
> TLS under sanitizers
> will become even slower.
I fully agree that we need a solution in 2.20+.
Cheers,
Carlos.
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list