[MTASCsft PATCH 01/??] MT-, AS- and AC-Safety docs
Carlos O'Donell
carlos@redhat.com
Tue Jan 28 14:22:00 GMT 2014
On 01/28/2014 12:57 AM, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Jan 27, 2014, "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>>> +Although the plugins mentioned as examples are all brought in by means
>>> +of dlopen, the @code{plugin} keyword does not imply any direct
>>> +involvement of the dynamic loader or the @code{libdl} interfaces: those
>
>> s/:/,/g
>
> Uhh, sorry, I failed to save this one before taking the diffs, because...
>
>>> +@item @code{posix}
>>> +@cindex posix
>
>> This should be !posix, or direclty use the macro to get it right?
>
> ... when I got to this one, I knew I'd already fixed it.
>
> Here's the incremental patch I put in.
>
> I've also updated the branch, rebasing it onto the current master and
> pushing it to the server, still in the lxoliva/thread-safety-docs
> branch.
OK, thanks.
I'm building from lxoliva/thread-safety-docs and reading the pdf.
Cheers,
Carlos.
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list