[MTASCsft PATCH 01/??] MT-, AS- and AC-Safety docs

Carlos O'Donell carlos@redhat.com
Tue Jan 28 14:22:00 GMT 2014


On 01/28/2014 12:57 AM, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Jan 27, 2014, "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
>>> +Although the plugins mentioned as examples are all brought in by means
>>> +of dlopen, the @code{plugin} keyword does not imply any direct
>>> +involvement of the dynamic loader or the @code{libdl} interfaces: those
> 
>> s/:/,/g
> 
> Uhh, sorry, I failed to save this one before taking the diffs, because...
> 
>>> +@item @code{posix}
>>> +@cindex posix
> 
>> This should be !posix, or direclty use the macro to get it right?
> 
> ... when I got to this one, I knew I'd already fixed it.
> 
> Here's the incremental patch I put in.
> 
> I've also updated the branch, rebasing it onto the current master and
> pushing it to the server, still in the lxoliva/thread-safety-docs
> branch.

OK, thanks.

I'm building from lxoliva/thread-safety-docs and reading the pdf.

Cheers,
Carlos.



More information about the Libc-alpha mailing list