Benchmark for sem_timedwait v1.1

[Siddhesh Poyarekar]

On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 08:26:56PM +0100, Ondřej Bílka wrote:
> There are no sensible inputs.

There are, one for each case, i.e. contended and uncontended.  I'll
write one up if you can't think of it.

> There may be different usage patterns to measure which may involve
> spawning threads which is out of bench-skeleton scope.

This particular benchmark you posted does not spawn threads; it only
calls a set of functions.  I agree that in most cases (not necessarily
all though) that involve spawning threads and measuring events across
threads, bench-skeleton would be a bad fit.

Siddhesh
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/attachments/20140222/ea14d4ee/attachment.sig>