glibc 2.19 status?

[Allan McRae]

On 01/02/14 10:01, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Jan 30, 2014, "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> 
>> On Thu, 30 Jan 2014, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>>> On Jan 30, 2014, Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Any other issues that need tracking missing from that list?
>>>
>>> I'm not sure where the MTASC safety docs patchset fits in this, but
>>> several of the patches are in, and a number of others are pending review
>>> and should be in over the next few days.  I hoped we'd have the patchset
>>> all in by now, but the process has been slower than anticipated.
> 
>> I thought this documentation was incomplete anyway - that you hadn't 
>> completed reviewing the properties of every function in glibc - or is the 
>> latest version in fact complete?
> 
> The latest patchset is indeed complete as in, every function in the
> glibc manual has a corresponding @safety note.  There are glibc
> functions that are not documented in the manual, and most of these have
> not had their safety properties assessed.
> 
> Carlos told me he'd have the review completed today/tonight, so it
> wouuld be appreciated if the release could be held up so as to include
> the entire patchset.
> 

If that is the case, I will not have to hold up anything at all.  There
is still a couple of decisions that need made before release.

Allan