[PING] [PATCH] x86_32: memcpy, mempcpy, memmove, memcpy_chk, mempcpy_chk, memmove_chk optimized with SSE2 unaligned loads/stores
H.J. Lu
hjl.tools@gmail.com
Tue Dec 23 19:20:00 GMT 2014
- Previous message (by thread): [PING] [PATCH] x86_32: memcpy, mempcpy, memmove, memcpy_chk, mempcpy_chk, memmove_chk optimized with SSE2 unaligned loads/stores
- Next message (by thread): [PING] [PATCH] x86_32: memcpy, mempcpy, memmove, memcpy_chk, mempcpy_chk, memmove_chk optimized with SSE2 unaligned loads/stores
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 3:56 AM, Andrew Senkevich
<andrew.n.senkevich@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> it is ping for patch which was discussed at the beginning of august,
> end of discussion is
> https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2014-08/msg00078.html
>
> Is it Ok for trunk?
Please provide a proper ChangeLog entry. If you can't push it upstream
yourself, please commit it with a proper commit log and send the output
of "git format-patch origin/master", which be applied with "git am",
so that other people can push it for you. You can check other people's
commits as examples.
Thanks.
--
H.J.
- Previous message (by thread): [PING] [PATCH] x86_32: memcpy, mempcpy, memmove, memcpy_chk, mempcpy_chk, memmove_chk optimized with SSE2 unaligned loads/stores
- Next message (by thread): [PING] [PATCH] x86_32: memcpy, mempcpy, memmove, memcpy_chk, mempcpy_chk, memmove_chk optimized with SSE2 unaligned loads/stores
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list