[PING] [PATCH] x86_32: memcpy, mempcpy, memmove, memcpy_chk, mempcpy_chk, memmove_chk optimized with SSE2 unaligned loads/stores
Ondřej Bílka
neleai@seznam.cz
Tue Dec 23 19:15:00 GMT 2014
- Previous message (by thread): [PING] [PATCH] x86_32: memcpy, mempcpy, memmove, memcpy_chk, mempcpy_chk, memmove_chk optimized with SSE2 unaligned loads/stores
- Next message (by thread): [PING] [PATCH] x86_32: memcpy, mempcpy, memmove, memcpy_chk, mempcpy_chk, memmove_chk optimized with SSE2 unaligned loads/stores
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 02:56:10PM +0300, Andrew Senkevich wrote:
> Hi,
>
> it is ping for patch which was discussed at the beginning of august,
> end of discussion is
> https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2014-08/msg00078.html
>
> Is it Ok for trunk?
>
It looked OK for me performancewise. I planned to check that for bugs
which is still in my TODO list. If somebody else checked that it would
be ok to commit.
- Previous message (by thread): [PING] [PATCH] x86_32: memcpy, mempcpy, memmove, memcpy_chk, mempcpy_chk, memmove_chk optimized with SSE2 unaligned loads/stores
- Next message (by thread): [PING] [PATCH] x86_32: memcpy, mempcpy, memmove, memcpy_chk, mempcpy_chk, memmove_chk optimized with SSE2 unaligned loads/stores
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list