[PATCH] sh: Use generic lowlevellock-futex.h.
Kaz Kojima
kkojima@rr.iij4u.or.jp
Thu Dec 18 12:43:00 GMT 2014
Torvald Riegel <triegel@redhat.com> wrote:
>> I definitely agree with your view about the custom asm. Switch to
>> the generic C implementation would be simply fine and the way to go.
>
> Does that mean I can simply commit a patch that removes the custom
> lowlevellock.h, or do you want to test this further before this is
> committed?
There are sh custom asm files depends on the custom lowlevellock.h.
The files below should be removed from sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/sh/
at the same time.
lowlevellock.h
lowlevellock.S
lowlevelrobustlock.S
libc-lowlevellock.S
pthread_barrier_wait.S
pthread_cond_broadcast.S
pthread_cond_signal.S
pthread_cond_timedwait.S
pthread_cond_wait.S
pthread_rwlock_rdlock.S
pthread_rwlock_timedrdlock.S
pthread_rwlock_timedwrlock.S
pthread_rwlock_unlock.S
pthread_rwlock_wrlock.S
sem_post.S
sem_timedwait.S
sem_trywait.S
sem_wait.S
I'd like to pre-approve the patch removing them all.
Regards,
kaz
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list