[PATCH] Fix atomic_full_barrier on x86 and x86_64.

[Torvald Riegel]

Ping.

On Mon, 2014-12-08 at 17:38 +0100, Torvald Riegel wrote:
> Ping.
> 
> On Tue, 2014-11-25 at 11:51 +0100, Torvald Riegel wrote:
> > On Wed, 2014-10-29 at 22:54 +0000, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> > > On Wed, 29 Oct 2014, Torvald Riegel wrote:
> > > 
> > > > So, mfence seems to have been introduced with SSE2.  Should I try to
> > > > test for SSE2 specifically, or rather assume SSE2 support for i786?
> > > 
> > > I think the i786 directories should be removed; config.guess will never 
> > > return such a processor name for GNU/Linux at least (I don't know what it 
> > > returns on Hurd).  The comment in sysdeps/i386/i786/Implies suggests it 
> > > was for PII, but PII was still family 6 (and family 15 came after family 
> > > 6, I don't think there were any x86 processors with family numbers 7 to 
> > > 14).
> > > 
> > > So, anything conditional on SSE2 should test for __SSE2__.
> > 
> > How does this updated patch look?  The non-SSE full barrier is what,
> > AFAIU, GCC emits.
> > 
> 
> 
>