[PATCH] powerpc: Fix unitialized variable
Joseph Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com
Thu Dec 11 14:40:00 GMT 2014
On Thu, 11 Dec 2014, Adhemerval Zanella wrote:
> + int truncating, connreset, n;
> + /* There is the following warning on some architectures:
> + 'resplen' may be used uninitialized in this function
> + [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
> + This is a false positive according to:
> + https://www.sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2014-12/msg00323.html
> + */
> + DIAG_PUSH_NEEDS_COMMENT;
> + DIAG_IGNORE_NEEDS_COMMENT (4.7, "-Wmaybe-uninitialized");
> + int resplen;
> + DIAG_POP_NEEDS_COMMENT;
* Do you actually need this here, or only around the use of the variable?
* An actual analysis of why the variable can't be used uninitialized would
be better than a URL. I.e., if buf2 == NULL then this code won't be
executed; if buf2 != NULL, then first time round the loop recvresp1 and
recvresp2 will be 0 so this code won't be executed but "thisresplenp =
&resplen;" followed by "*thisresplenp = rlen;" will be executed so that
subsequent times round the loop resplen has been initialized.
* The version number in DIAG_IGNORE_NEEDS_COMMENT is the most recent GCC
version with which the issue has been observed, not the oldest.
* A conditional __GNUC_PREREQ (4, 7) is needed around the
DIAG_IGNORE_NEEDS_COMMENT call because 4.6 doesn't have
-Wmaybe-uninitialized (if the warnings appear with 4.6, a #else case to
use -Wuninitialized instead with 4.6 will be needed).
--
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list