[PATCH 17/19] Provide default definition for IS_IN when _LIBC is not defined
Roland McGrath
roland@hack.frob.com
Fri Aug 22 19:38:00 GMT 2014
Please explain this more. There must be on appearances of IS_IN or
anything like that in actual installed headers. So I guess you are
talking about include/ wrappers for headers that will be installed.
But still I don't understand under what conditions any of this code
is used where _LIBC is not defined. Is it just in tests?
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list