[PATCH v1.1 20/20] Include config.h in MIN-CPPFLAGS

[Siddhesh Poyarekar]

On 22 August 2014 19:01, Stefan Liebler <stli@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> Hi Siddhesh,
>
> I扉e tested your is_in_module branch on s390x.

Thanks!

> But building the testsuite fails while building nptl_db/db-symbols.v.iT
> because NOT_IN is not defined in structs.def:
> structs.def:81:12: error: missing binary operator before token "("
>  #if NOT_IN (libpthread) || TLS_TCB_AT_TP
>             ^
>
> The defining NOT_IN to zero of patch 19 is not done, because of patch v1.1
> 20.
>
> patch 19:
> +#ifndef _LIBC
> +# define NOT_IN(lib) (0)
> +#endif
>
> patch v1.1 20:
> +          -D_LIBC -include $(common-objpfx)config.h \
>
>
> After changing patch 19 to
> #ifndef NOT_IN
> # define NOT_IN(lib) (0)
> #endif

I think I need to generate libc-modules.h without depending on soversions.i.

> the following tests are failing:
> FAIL: conform/ISO/stdlib.h/conform
> FAIL: conform/ISO11/stdlib.h/conform
> FAIL: conform/ISO99/stdlib.h/conform
> FAIL: conform/POSIX/mqueue.h/conform
> FAIL: conform/POSIX/stdlib.h/conform
> FAIL: conform/POSIX2008/mqueue.h/conform
> FAIL: conform/POSIX2008/stdlib.h/conform
> FAIL: conform/UNIX98/mqueue.h/conform
> FAIL: conform/XOPEN2K/stdlib.h/conform
> FAIL: conform/XOPEN2K8/mqueue.h/conform
> FAIL: conform/XOPEN2K8/stdlib.h/conform
> with either:
>>Namespace violation: "IS_IN"
> or:

OK, that's porobably a good reason to not try to define IS_IN or
NOT_IN and just use _LIBC in the conditionals.

I'll fix these things up and update the branch.

Thanks,
Siddhesh
-- 
http://siddhesh.in