[PATCH] Remove arm lowlevellock.c

[Joseph S. Myers]

On Wed, 30 Apr 2014, Bernie Ogden wrote:

> The workaround is that some of the arm lowlevellock.c functions
> promote futex to 2 if it is 1. Generic lowlevellock.c always promotes
> futex to 2. Hence, removing arm's lowlevellock.c doesn't cause a
> regression in this sense.

Thanks.  The original patch is OK.

> I agree with you on unifying lowlevellock.h - so it'll take a little
> longer for me to submit the fix for the second bug as I'll stop to
> unify the files as part of the work. (Quite a few of them do look
> unifiable.)

FWIW there are two main different styles of syscall error handling in the 
files, but I don't know if that's in any way a necessary difference; at 
least it shouldn't require duplicating the whole file.  (Compare the ARM 
and MIPS versions of lll_futex_timed_wait, for example.)

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com