[Patch] Fix __mips16 undef macro warnings.
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com
Tue Apr 29 21:03:00 GMT 2014
On Tue, 29 Apr 2014, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> Add a large descriptive comment about the use of __mips16
> here and perhaps even talk about __mips32 and __mips64.
I think a large comment about a compiler-defined macro would be completely
out-of-place in this header - in MIPS-specific code, commenting on a test
of __mips16 is just like
i++; /* Add 1 to i. */
in generic C code. You can comment about *why* testing MIPS16 is
relevant, but *what* the test does and *how* it does it are complete plain
and don't need commenting.
--
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list