[PING^2] RFC [PATCH] BZ#1077902: New API gettimezone
Carlos O'Donell
carlos@redhat.com
Tue Apr 29 20:59:00 GMT 2014
On 04/29/2014 03:14 PM, Paul Eggert wrote:
> On 04/29/2014 11:39 AM, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
>> In that case nothing short of stuffing the zone*into* TZ will
>> help
> And even that could have problems if the API stuffs a
> version-3-format zone into a TZ string that's shipped to a
> destination system that groks only version 2.Presumably the version
> number will be in the string somewhere so the destination could
> report an error, but how would that actually work?
I'll let PJP think about it.
>> Unfortunately all of this complicates the API.
> Yes. This complication is a cost, and the cost/benefit ratio seems
> pretty high here.
I don't feel like we're done hashing it out.
As I said before I'd like to see the unified tzalloc et. al. solution
since it solves the unique problem of tz-specific messages
per-thread and may with a slight enhancement fix this issue.
The implementation is certainly up in the air, but I reserve my
judgement until later.
Cheers,
Carlos.
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list