Kill libc-ports?

[Mike Frysinger]

On Friday 06 September 2013 03:47:41 Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> On 09/06/2013 03:41 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> > Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh@redhat.com> writes:
> >> On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 04:13:16PM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> >>> Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh@redhat.com> writes:
> >>>> Do we still need the libc-ports mailing list?  I figured we could all
> >>>> just work on libc-alpha.  We're aiming at getting rid of the ports
> >>>> directory anyway, and this seems like an easy step.
> >>> 
> >>> If we are changing mailing lists we could perhaps rename this one as
> >>> well.
> >> 
> >> libc-patches?
> > 
> > No, this is a general development discussion list.
> 
> How about less typing and just `glibc@sourceware.org'?

+1
-mike
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/attachments/20130911/802173b0/attachment.sig>