OndÅej BÃlka wrote: > If we go this way a intprops.h should be relicensed to LGPL2.1+ It's already licensed to LGPLv2+ so we're OK on this point. (In Gnulib the license information for that file is in modules/intprops.) > does adding intprops.h to include > directory look reasonable? Looks OK to me (though as its author I'm biased....).