[PATCH] Refactor malloc (x * sizeof (t) to XNMALLOC (x, t).
KOSAKI Motohiro
kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com
Thu Oct 31 21:14:00 GMT 2013
(10/31/13 4:59 PM), Paul Eggert wrote:
> On 10/31/2013 09:46 AM, OndÅej BÃlka wrote:
>
>> +#define XNMALLOC(e, tp) (tp *) malloc ((e) * sizeof (tp))
>
> Don't we need something similar for realloc?
>
> It needs another parentheses around the entire definiens.
>
> Better yet, why not a function instead of a macro?
> E.g., something like this in libc-internal.h:
>
> /* Return the address of an array of N objects, each of nonzero
> size S, or NULL (setting errno) if the allocation fails. */
>
> inline void *
> nmalloc (size_t n, size_t s)
> {
> return malloc (n <= SIZE_MAX / s ? n * s : SIZE_MAX);
I'm worry about this. Rounding down to SIZE_DOWN is sometime dangerous.
How about return NULL instead? The best fallback way depend on caller code.
> }
>
> That way, instead of this:
>
> result = XNMALLOC (step_cnt, struct __gconv_step);
>
> a caller can write this:
>
> result = nmalloc (step_cnt, sizeof *result);
>
> with simpler semantics, and with less churn later if 'result' changes
> its type.
>
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list