[PATCH] Use __glibc_(un)likely instead __builtin_expect.

Rich Felker dalias@aerifal.cx
Sat Oct 26 00:06:00 GMT 2013


On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 02:33:54PM -0700, Roland McGrath wrote:
> > I have not done a full review of the patch, but I am of the opinion
> > that if you can show that the generated code is identical, then such a
> > cleanup patch should be OK.  I'd like opinions from others from this
> > though, so please wait for more reviews before you push this change.
> 
> If generated code is identical and source changes introduce no style
> violations (missing whitespace, overlong lines), then it's fine.

Is any of this code shared with gnulib? That might be an issue.

Rich



More information about the Libc-alpha mailing list