[MTASCsft PATCH WIP5 00/33] MT-, AS- and AC-Safety docs

[Alexandre Oliva]

On Nov 18, 2013, "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos@redhat.com> wrote:

> I imagine though that after this review you might not want to see any
> documentation work for a while :-)

Nah.  It's been enjoyable work, besides its being useful for me to get
acquainted with (almost) the entire glibc codebase.

> The only other objection we've had is from Joseph Myers who would
> prefer you fix the bugs instead of documenting them.

I didn't get the impression that was his point.  AFAICT he just wanted
an existing patch that fixed a bug mentioned in the docs to go in first
so as to obviate that note.  That makes perfect sense to me!

> Without any solid objections from anyone, I'm going to do my review
> of your patches one-by-one and give you my ACK for these changes.

Thanks!

For each patch that gets changes from what's already posted, I'll post
an updated patch, consolidating the requested changes and noting any
other changes I may have made on my own, and wait for another ACK before
checking them in.

-- 
Alexandre Oliva, freedom fighter    http://FSFLA.org/~lxoliva/
You must be the change you wish to see in the world. -- Gandhi
Be Free! -- http://FSFLA.org/   FSF Latin America board member
Free Software Evangelist      Red Hat Brazil Compiler Engineer