[PATCH v2 1/2] Add nmalloc and nrealloc
Rich Felker
dalias@aerifal.cx
Mon Nov 4 20:04:00 GMT 2013
On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 09:43:08AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> On 11/03/2013 09:00 PM, Paul Eggert wrote:
>
> >I would avoid macros whose arguments are types; in this
> >case they're not worth the extra confusion caused by the fact that
> >they're not function-like. Just have the callers invoke nmalloc,
> >with no NMALLOC macro. It's easier and less error-prone to
> >read and write code like this:
> >
> > new_global = nmalloc (new_nalloc, sizeof *new_global);
> >
> >than code like this:
> >
> > new_global = NMALLOC (new_nalloc, struct link_map *);
>
> The downside is that
>
> new_global = nmalloc (new_nalloc, sizeof new_global);
>
> type-checks (and may even be correct on some architectures), but
> this fails reliably at compile time:
>
> new_global = NMALLOC (new_nalloc, struct link_map);
>
> I understand the reservations about magic macros, though.
What's worse still, if the macro takes a type and passes it to sizeof,
a caller might inadvertently pass sizeof(type) itself, causing the
macro to evaluate sizeof(sizeof(type)), i.e. sizeof(size_t), instead
of the desired size.
Rich
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list