Tracking patch pings

[Carlos O'Donell]

On 05/16/2013 10:43 AM, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> On 05/16/2013 03:14 PM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
>> On Thu, 16 May 2013, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
>>
>>> My impression is that we have a couple of patches that get pinged but it's not
>>> such a large number that we need an automated tool and something low tech like
>>> a wiki page would be a good start - and it would tell us more about the size
>>> of the problem.
>>
>> Looking just at <http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2013-05/threads.html>
>> I see patches/pings from this month arguably pending review:
> 
> Thanks for the list, this is worse than I thought,

With glibc it's almost always worse than you think ;-)

c.