ChangeLog entry complexity
Siddhesh Poyarekar
siddhesh.poyarekar@gmail.com
Sat Mar 30 11:43:00 GMT 2013
On 29 March 2013 07:21, Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org> wrote:
> Cons:
> Resources spent on writing/editing ChangeLog entries
> Merging is more difficult
> git log/blame is "equivalent"
> Makes refactoring difficult (long ChangeLog entries)
> Do not provide detail needed to understand the change (why/how)
> ChangeLogs are incomplete
- Artificially raises the bar for ad hoc contributions
Siddhesh
--
http://siddhesh.in
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list