[attention machine maintainers] [PATCH] <math.h> issignaling

[David Miller]

From: Thomas Schwinge <thomas@codesourcery.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 07:52:31 +0100

> On Sun, 24 Mar 2013 17:30:33 -0400, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
>> From: Thomas Schwinge <thomas@codesourcery.com>
>> Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2013 12:17:19 +0100
>> 
>> > I have now pushed a new version of this patch in the
>> > tschwinge/issignaling branch.  Would machine maintainers please test
>> > this branch/patch and report back?
>> 
>> It doesn't even build on sparc because the code block that is
>> CPP enabled in the ldbl-128 version of issignaling() has
>> an #error in it.
> 
> Yes, because that code has not yet been tested, as the #error says --
> sorry for not telling that in advance.  Do you want me to publish a new
> branch and/or patch with that line removed?

With the #error line removed, sparc builds cleanly and there are no
testsuite regressions.

I tested with 32-bit sparc V9, which is generally very harmonious with
64-bit sparc.  But I'll kick off a 64-bit build as well and let you
know if anything turns up.