Ping: [PATCH v4] faster strlen on x64

Carlos O'Donell carlos@redhat.com
Tue Mar 12 13:24:00 GMT 2013


On 03/11/2013 05:15 AM, Ondřej Bílka wrote:
> Carlos, what is you opinion?

The patch looks good. I have one last question though.

We remove some interesting code in the existing strlen implementations
that ensure that strlen calls from libc itself do not go through the PLT.

Have you verified that after your changes there are no testsuite regressions
in the plt check test or that the internal calls to strlen avoid the PLT?

OK to checkin after this additional validation with posted result.

Cheers,
Carlos.



More information about the Libc-alpha mailing list