[PATCH] Optimize strchr (x, 0)
Ondřej Bílka
neleai@seznam.cz
Sat Mar 9 14:44:00 GMT 2013
On Sat, Mar 09, 2013 at 07:48:02PM +0600, Denis Zaitceff wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 4:43 PM, OndÅej BÃlka <neleai@seznam.cz> wrote:
> >
> > As strlen is more optimized than rawmemchr it will be more effective
> > than now. (If rawmemchr(x,0) is faster then it is performance regression of
> > strlen.)
>
> Why do you think it is more optimized?
Test it. If you find architecture where rawmemchr/strchr is faster feel
free send patch like:
size_t strlen(char *x)
{
return strchr(x,0)-x;
}
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list