[COMMITTED PATCH] Fix NEED_DL_SYSINFO_DSO conditionals.
Carlos O'Donell
carlos@redhat.com
Fri Mar 1 23:22:00 GMT 2013
On 03/01/2013 05:46 PM, Roland McGrath wrote:
> All the checks on NEED_DL_SYSINFO_DSO were actually checking
> NEED_DL_SYSINFO || NEED_DL_SYSINFO_DSO, which makes no sense.
> I cleaned them up. This can have no effect on existing configurations
> because sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/dl-sysdep.h defines NEED_DL_SYSINFO_DSO
> unconditionally.
>
> Verified no text changes in ld.so or libc.so on x86_64-linux-gnu.
Thanks for this.
This had confused me considerably when I looked at the vDSO support
for i686, and I just thought maybe I was dumb, and didn't bother
to go through the exercise of verifying this.
Cheers,
Carlos.
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list