"define FOO" vs "define\tFOO"
Mike Frysinger
vapier@gentoo.org
Wed Jun 26 19:07:00 GMT 2013
On Wednesday 26 June 2013 10:31:16 chrubis@suse.cz wrote:
> I've been greping for "define MAX" in installed glibc headers on my
> machine and been confused because only half of the expected results
> showed up in /usr/include/sys/param.h. After having a closer look at the
> file I found that half of the defines uses tabs and half of them uses
> spaces (which is visually undistinguishable in this case).
>
> While it's not wrong it's quite confusing (at least for me). Looking
> into glibc sources the file in question seems to be fixed but there are
> others that suffer from the same problem. Should I prepare patches to
> unify these to use spaces only?
i wouldn't mind seeing everything changed to spaces there
-mike
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/attachments/20130626/cf700062/attachment.sig>
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list