[PATCH rsa/stdint_noheaders] Cleanup: Add #include <stdint.h> for uint[32|64]_t usage (except installed headers)
Thomas Schwinge
thomas@codesourcery.com
Fri Jun 21 07:37:00 GMT 2013
Hi!
On Thu, 20 Jun 2013 19:10:31 -0400, Carlos O'Donell <carlos@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 06/20/2013 05:24 PM, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> > Well, as you can see from my »I'm seeing« snippet above, the build
> > process already happily does recreate the generated file (when its
> > Makefile dependencies tell to do so, I suppose), so -- assuming the
> > generator reliably recreates the file and does not have any special
> > run-time requirements (which might be the argument for keeping configure
> > files checked in) -- there is no point in keeping the generated file
> > checked in other than saving some really minimal amount of build time.
>
> What about read-only source directories shared amongst multiple builds?
Of course my »subsequent action« included moving these (that is, modify
their generation Makefile rules) from the source to the build tree.
> > Is this worth a policy change (and subsequent action, for all generated
> > files that are kept checked in; the list of which is still to be
> > determined)?
>
> I don't think it's worth the policy change. It's just easier for everyone
> to remember to checkin the regenerated files.
>
> What benefit is there to not checking in the generated file? You'd have
> to go check a long list of such files to remember your's is on the OK
> list and not check it in?
I don't follow you. If a file is in the source tree, it's checked in; if
it's in the build tree it's not checked in.
Anyway, the issue is moot now that we have established we don't require
Perl for building glibc.
Grüße,
Thomas
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 489 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/attachments/20130621/a591fc09/attachment.sig>
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list