[Patches] IN6_IS_* macro and POSIX compilation

[Sebastien Vincent]

Hi,

Can we expect a fix in next glibc version (2.18/2.19 ) ?

Le 20/04/2013 13:05, Andreas Schwab a écrit :
> I think the union members should always be present (they are in the
> implementation namespace, so no conflict possible), and the
> IN6_IS_ADDR... macros should reference them directly instead of through
> the s6_addr32 macro.
>
> Andreas.
>