[RFC] Automatic nightly builds?
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com
Sun Jul 21 21:03:00 GMT 2013
On Sun, 21 Jul 2013, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
> "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph@codesourcery.com> writes:
>
> > [...]
> > Diffs in .out files are not reliable indications of changes to testsuite
> > failures. Instead, we should get in some version of Tomas Dohnalek's
> > patch to log PASS / FAIL results for individual tests. At that point, you
> > have something for which comparisons are reasonably reliable and useful,
> > even if not perfect.
>
> As an experiment, some of y'all might try emailing a copy of your
> dejagnu .sum files to dejazilla@elastic.org, to get them stored in a
Without Tomas Dohnalek's changes, there isn't anything looking passably
like a DejaGnu .sum file at all. (With those changes, generating a
DejaGnu-like header and footer would be easy enough. There are plenty of
other glibc testsuite issues as described at length in
<http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2013-07/msg00256.html>, including
wanting PASS/FAIL structured information for individual assertions within
tests, but just PASS/FAIL information for tests run from makefiles - or
even just for the subset of tests run with generic makefile rules rather
than with their own special rules, which I think is all Tomas's patches
actually handle - would be a very good start.)
--
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list