[PATCH 03/15] Add HAS_RTM

[Carlos O'Donell]

On 01/10/2013 04:23 PM, Roland McGrath wrote:
> The details of this change are OK, but I don't think it should have gone in
> before we approve any code using HAS_RTM.  It's far from clear that we will
> do so any time soon, and this adds startup overhead (an extra cpuid) to
> every run for no benefit to any code that is in or near approval.

Agreed. This should have waited for code that actually uses it.

Cheers,
Carlos.